Choctaw vs Immigrants from England Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,585,593 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.280 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,085,552 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.049 and weighted average of 4.7%, a difference of 0.93%.

Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Choctaw	Immigrants from England
Minimum	1.3%	3.0%
Maximum	37.0%	22.9%
Range	35.7%	19.9%
Mean	10.1%	9.2%
Median	6.7%	9.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.6%	5.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.1%	11.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.5%	6.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.7%	5.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.6%	4.9%

Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Immigrants from England by Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Serbia (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Syria (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lebanon (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Lithuanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Austrian (4.8%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Immigrants from Germany (4.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (4.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Ukrainian (4.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Bulgarian (4.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Maltese (4.7%, a difference of 0.070%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
Syrians	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 4.7%
Bulgarians	96.6 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 4.7%
Maltese	96.5 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Romania	96.4 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| England	96.3 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Germany	96.3 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 4.7%
Ukrainians	96.1 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Morocco	95.7 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.7%
Macedonians	95.7 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.7%
Albanians	95.3 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	95.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.7%
Finns	94.7 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Senegal	94.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Thailand	93.7 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	93.0 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.7%
Austrians	91.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 4.8%
Choctaw	90.3 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Serbia	90.2 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Syria	90.1 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	89.6 /100 \| #131	Excellent 4.8%
Lithuanians	89.6 /100 \| #132	Excellent 4.8%