Chinese vs Soviet Union Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
COMPARE
Chinese
Soviet Union
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Comparison
Chinese
Soviet Union
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
90.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Soviet Union Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,562,312 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.255 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,195,045 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 20.5%.
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Soviet Union |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 11.9% | 17.6% |
Range | 10.9% | 16.6% |
Mean | 4.5% | 5.3% |
Median | 3.5% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 3.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 5.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 3.7% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Hmong (4.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Fijian (4.2%, a difference of 1.2%), Sudanese (4.4%, a difference of 5.0%), Chickasaw (4.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and Immigrants from Cuba (4.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Malaysian (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Canada (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Korea (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Celtic (5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Seminole (5.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
Finns | 92.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Eastern Europeans | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seminole | 91.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 91.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Celtics | 91.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 91.0 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Malaysians | 90.4 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Soviet Union | 90.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 89.7 /100 | #119 | Excellent 5.1% |
Irish | 88.8 /100 | #120 | Excellent 5.1% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.6 /100 | #122 | Excellent 5.1% |
Asians | 88.5 /100 | #123 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | North America | 87.9 /100 | #124 | Excellent 5.1% |
Dutch | 87.6 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |