Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,028,155 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.343 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,646,397 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 1.4%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Bhutanese	Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Minimum	0.80%	3.2%
Maximum	25.0%	33.6%
Range	24.2%	30.4%
Mean	9.7%	11.1%
Median	9.1%	9.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.9%	6.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	11.9%	11.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.0%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.1%	7.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.1%	7.0%

Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Cuban (8.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Australia (8.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Japan (8.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Arapaho (8.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and U.S. Virgin Islander (8.1%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Belgium (8.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Nicaraguan (8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Burmese (8.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Ireland (8.1%, a difference of 0.34%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Immigrants \| Japan	99.7 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 8.0%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.7 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 8.0%
Cubans	99.7 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 8.0%
Bhutanese	99.7 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 8.0%
Arapaho	99.7 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 8.1%
U.S. Virgin Islanders	99.7 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.7 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Singapore	99.7 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 8.1%
Basques	99.5 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 8.1%
New Zealanders	99.5 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Korea	99.5 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 8.1%
Egyptians	99.5 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 8.1%
Venezuelans	99.5 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	99.5 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.4 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 8.1%
Nicaraguans	99.3 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Belgium	99.3 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.3 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	99.3 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 8.2%
Burmese	99.2 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 8.2%