Bahamian vs Immigrants from Syria Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,279,654 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,992,649 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Syria and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 1.4%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Bahamian	Immigrants from Syria
Minimum	0.80%	1.8%
Maximum	18.6%	80.6%
Range	17.8%	78.8%
Mean	8.2%	13.3%
Median	8.3%	8.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.3%	7.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	10.8%	10.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.5%	3.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.5%	16.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.4%	16.2%

Demographics Similar to Bahamians and Immigrants from Syria by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Immigrants from Egypt (7.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Malaysia (7.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Moroccan (7.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Latvia (7.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and Potawatomi (7.8%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Syria are Immigrants from Austria (8.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Africa (8.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Indian (Asian) (8.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Argentinean (7.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (7.9%, a difference of 0.29%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Potawatomi	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Latvia	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 7.8%
Moroccans	100.0 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 7.8%
Bahamians	100.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Egypt	100.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	99.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 7.9%
Filipinos	99.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 7.9%
Ottawa	99.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 7.9%
Iranians	99.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 7.9%
Indonesians	99.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Morocco	99.9 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 7.9%
Uruguayans	99.9 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Albania	99.9 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	99.9 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	99.9 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 7.9%
Argentineans	99.9 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Austria	99.9 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 8.0%
Immigrants \| Syria	99.9 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 8.0%
Immigrants \| South Africa	99.9 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 8.0%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 8.0%