Austrian vs Immigrants from Thailand Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,069,556 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 294,949,479 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251 and weighted average of 4.7%, a difference of 0.24%.

Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Austrian	Immigrants from Thailand
Minimum	3.5%	0.96%
Maximum	100.0%	20.8%
Range	96.5%	19.8%
Mean	25.2%	5.8%
Median	9.9%	4.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.8%	4.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	16.8%	6.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.0%	2.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	33.2%	3.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	32.3%	3.6%

Demographics Similar to Austrians and Immigrants from Thailand by Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Choctaw (4.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Serbia (4.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Syria (4.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (4.8%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Senegal (4.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Finnish (4.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (4.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and Albanian (4.7%, a difference of 0.28%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
Immigrants \| England	96.3 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Germany	96.3 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 4.7%
Ukrainians	96.1 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Morocco	95.7 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.7%
Macedonians	95.7 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.7%
Albanians	95.3 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	95.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.7%
Finns	94.7 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Senegal	94.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Thailand	93.7 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	93.0 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.7%
Austrians	91.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 4.8%
Choctaw	90.3 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Serbia	90.2 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Syria	90.1 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	89.6 /100 \| #131	Excellent 4.8%
Lithuanians	89.6 /100 \| #132	Excellent 4.8%
Yaqui	89.5 /100 \| #133	Excellent 4.8%
Basques	88.8 /100 \| #134	Excellent 4.8%
Pennsylvania Germans	87.8 /100 \| #135	Excellent 4.8%
French Canadians	87.6 /100 \| #136	Excellent 4.8%