Austrian vs Immigrants from Thailand Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Austrian
Immigrants from Thailand
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Austrians
Immigrants from Thailand
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
44.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
42.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
183rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Austrian vs Immigrants from Thailand Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,962,555 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.434 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,957,387 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.000 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.10%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Austrian | Immigrants from Thailand |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 68.4% | 15.0% |
| Range | 66.4% | 13.9% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 7.0% |
| Median | 7.5% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Austrians and Immigrants from Thailand by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from England (6.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ghana (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |