Argentinean vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,383,729 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,742,242 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 0.81%.

Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Argentinean	Immigrants from Chile
Minimum	0.90%	1.5%
Maximum	31.9%	11.4%
Range	31.0%	9.9%
Mean	5.2%	4.4%
Median	4.2%	4.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.2%	2.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.3%	5.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.1%	2.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.6%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.6%	2.4%

Demographics Similar to Argentineans and Immigrants from Chile by Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Icelander (4.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Slovene (4.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from China (4.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (4.4%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Australia (4.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Kenya (4.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Scotland (4.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Asia (4.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Kenyan (4.4%, a difference of 0.23%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
Cambodians	97.0 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 4.4%
Icelanders	96.8 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 4.4%
Argentineans	96.8 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Ireland	96.8 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 4.4%
Slovenes	96.7 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| China	96.7 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	96.7 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 4.4%
Northern Europeans	96.5 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 4.4%
Lithuanians	96.5 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 4.4%
Poles	96.4 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Romania	96.3 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Jordan	96.3 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 4.4%
Dutch	96.1 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 4.4%
Indians (Asian)	96.0 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	95.9 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 4.4%
Kenyans	95.7 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Scotland	95.6 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Asia	95.6 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Australia	95.3 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Chile	95.2 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Kenya	95.0 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 4.4%