Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas, TX

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Dallas
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas

4.6%
45.1%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas, TX

Zip Code Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. 75246 45.1% 27.2% (+17.9)#269 24.1% (+21.0)#4,427
2. 75203 42.8% 27.2% (+15.6)#314 24.1% (+18.7)#5,008
3. 75225 42.7% 27.2% (+15.5)#316 24.1% (+18.6)#5,021
4. 75217 41.6% 27.2% (+14.4)#339 24.1% (+17.5)#5,323
5. 75216 40.9% 27.2% (+13.7)#349 24.1% (+16.8)#5,499
6. 75212 38.1% 27.2% (+10.9)#412 24.1% (+14.0)#6,363
7. 75237 37.1% 27.2% (+9.95)#429 24.1% (+13.0)#6,678
8. 75253 35.9% 27.2% (+8.73)#459 24.1% (+11.8)#7,084
9. 75220 35.8% 27.2% (+8.59)#461 24.1% (+11.7)#7,112
10. 75252 35.7% 27.2% (+8.56)#462 24.1% (+11.6)#7,123
11. 75215 32.8% 27.2% (+5.65)#543 24.1% (+8.74)#8,340
12. 75249 32.3% 27.2% (+5.16)#560 24.1% (+8.24)#8,529
13. 75211 32.1% 27.2% (+4.91)#565 24.1% (+8.00)#8,632
14. 75240 32.1% 27.2% (+4.89)#567 24.1% (+7.98)#8,638
15. 75228 30.7% 27.2% (+3.54)#608 24.1% (+6.63)#9,211
16. 75230 30.3% 27.2% (+3.12)#621 24.1% (+6.21)#9,390
17. 75254 30.1% 27.2% (+2.91)#632 24.1% (+6.00)#9,466
18. 75210 30.0% 27.2% (+2.84)#633 24.1% (+5.92)#9,493
19. 75204 30.0% 27.2% (+2.80)#634 24.1% (+5.88)#9,560
20. 75241 28.0% 27.2% (+0.792)#700 24.1% (+3.88)#10,552
21. 75231 26.9% 27.2% (-0.263)#746 24.1% (+2.82)#11,101
22. 75233 26.3% 27.2% (-0.841)#769 24.1% (+2.25)#11,390
23. 75201 25.8% 27.2% (-1.32)#796 24.1% (+1.77)#11,650
24. 75205 25.2% 27.2% (-1.94)#825 24.1% (+1.14)#11,981
25. 75227 24.7% 27.2% (-2.42)#843 24.1% (+0.665)#12,304
26. 75243 23.1% 27.2% (-4.11)#900 24.1% (-1.02)#13,253
27. 75236 23.0% 27.2% (-4.18)#904 24.1% (-1.10)#13,287
28. 75224 22.7% 27.2% (-4.44)#910 24.1% (-1.35)#13,429
29. 75223 21.6% 27.2% (-5.54)#946 24.1% (-2.45)#14,049
30. 75287 21.4% 27.2% (-5.80)#952 24.1% (-2.71)#14,203
31. 75208 20.8% 27.2% (-6.36)#974 24.1% (-3.27)#14,479
32. 75232 19.2% 27.2% (-7.92)#1,022 24.1% (-4.83)#15,368
33. 75218 17.6% 27.2% (-9.55)#1,076 24.1% (-6.46)#16,343
34. 75229 16.1% 27.2% (-11.1)#1,126 24.1% (-8.02)#17,235
35. 75206 16.0% 27.2% (-11.2)#1,134 24.1% (-8.09)#17,272
36. 75235 14.9% 27.2% (-12.3)#1,171 24.1% (-9.21)#17,958
37. 75219 14.1% 27.2% (-13.1)#1,196 24.1% (-10.0)#18,408
38. 75238 12.5% 27.2% (-14.6)#1,238 24.1% (-11.5)#19,296
39. 75248 9.6% 27.2% (-17.6)#1,331 24.1% (-14.5)#20,950
40. 75234 9.5% 27.2% (-17.6)#1,333 24.1% (-14.6)#20,999
41. 75214 8.4% 27.2% (-18.8)#1,369 24.1% (-15.7)#21,592
42. 75244 4.6% 27.2% (-22.6)#1,445 24.1% (-19.5)#23,281

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas, TX?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas, TX are:
#1
45.1%
#2
42.8%
#3
42.7%
#4
41.6%
#5
40.9%
#6
38.1%
#7
37.1%
#8
35.9%
#9
35.8%
#10
35.7%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas, TX?
75246 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas, TX with 45.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas, TX?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Dallas is 28.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Texas?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Texas is 27.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.