Zimbabwean vs Swiss Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Swiss
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Comparison
Zimbabweans
Swiss
20.4%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
21.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
44.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Swiss Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,868,173 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037 and weighted average of 20.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,334,807 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Swiss |
Minimum | 0.87% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 43.9% | 44.7% |
Range | 43.0% | 41.3% |
Mean | 17.3% | 18.8% |
Median | 18.1% | 17.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.3% | 22.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Swiss by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Czech (20.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Latvia (20.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Mexican American Indian (20.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Nigerian (20.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Israel (20.4%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (20.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from China (20.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Barbados (20.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 44.2 /100 | #177 | Average 20.2% |
Swiss | 44.0 /100 | #178 | Average 20.2% |
Ethiopians | 43.8 /100 | #179 | Average 20.2% |
Iraqis | 43.3 /100 | #180 | Average 20.2% |
Immigrants | China | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 20.2% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 20.2% |
Lebanese | 40.6 /100 | #183 | Average 20.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 39.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 20.2% |
Nepalese | 39.7 /100 | #185 | Fair 20.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 37.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 20.2% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 36.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 20.2% |
Scandinavians | 34.6 /100 | #188 | Fair 20.3% |
Immigrants | Germany | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 20.3% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 29.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 20.3% |
Moroccans | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 20.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 24.4 /100 | #192 | Fair 20.4% |
Nigerians | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 20.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 20.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 23.0 /100 | #195 | Fair 20.4% |
Czechs | 22.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 20.4% |
Zimbabweans | 21.0 /100 | #197 | Fair 20.4% |