Zimbabwean vs Estonian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Estonian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Zimbabweans
Estonians
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Estonian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,119,153 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,738,905 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 13.9%, a difference of 2.1%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Estonian |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 25.4% | 98.5% |
Mean | 11.1% | 19.0% |
Median | 9.4% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 17.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 20.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 19.8% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Estonians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Sweden (14.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (14.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Scandinavian (14.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Belgium (14.1%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Korean (13.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Italian (13.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Asia (13.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (13.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Greece (13.9%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Estonians | 99.2 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Tsimshian | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.5 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Zimbabweans | 98.5 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.2% |