South African vs English Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
South African
English
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
South Africans
English
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
93.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs English Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,612,100 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.813 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 565,080,494 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603 and weighted average of 14.9%, a difference of 0.67%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | English |
Minimum | 2.3% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 50.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 48.4% | 97.2% |
Mean | 13.2% | 26.1% |
Median | 11.7% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 29.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 17.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 24.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 24.1% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and English by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Scottish (15.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Pakistani (15.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Norway (15.0%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to English are Immigrants from Denmark (14.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Irish (14.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Belgian (14.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Sri Lankan (14.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (14.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Basques | 94.7 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Serbians | 94.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Chileans | 94.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 14.9% |
English | 93.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Irish | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Belgians | 93.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Sri Lankans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 93.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |