Scottish vs Carpatho Rusyn Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Scottish
Carpatho Rusyn
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Scottish
Carpatho Rusyns
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
91.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs Carpatho Rusyn Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 544,607,690 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.768 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,411,272 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 0.17%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scottish | Carpatho Rusyn |
Minimum | 2.1% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 63.2% |
Range | 97.9% | 59.5% |
Mean | 38.1% | 17.5% |
Median | 25.5% | 14.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.8% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.4% | 20.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 37.6% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.5% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.2% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish and Carpatho Rusyns by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Albanian (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (15.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Norway (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and English (15.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |