Osage vs Austrian Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Osage
Austrian
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Osage
Austrians
16.4%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
83.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Austrian Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,487,860 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,453,770 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.905 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 25.4%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Austrian |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 5.2% |
| Maximum | 77.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 75.3% | 94.8% |
| Mean | 25.2% | 29.4% |
| Median | 21.3% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.8% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.3% | 35.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 20.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 25.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.9% | 25.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Osage by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Guatemalan (16.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Indonesian (16.4%, a difference of 0.16%), American (16.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Cape Verdean (16.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Comanche (16.5%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.6% |
Demographics Similar to Austrians by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Immigrants from Iraq (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), New Zealander (13.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Brazilian (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Chile (13.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Scandinavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.3 /100 | #132 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Serbians | 87.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 13.0% |
| South Africans | 85.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 85.5 /100 | #136 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Brazilians | 84.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Austrians | 83.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 83.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 13.1% |
| New Zealanders | 83.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Scandinavians | 82.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Israelis | 81.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Native Hawaiians | 78.9 /100 | #144 | Good 13.2% |
| Colombians | 77.2 /100 | #145 | Good 13.2% |
| South Americans | 76.9 /100 | #146 | Good 13.2% |