Latvian vs Immigrants from Latin America Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,394,017 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.006 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 529,992,515 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.484 and weighted average of 19.7%, a difference of 1.3%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Latvian	Immigrants from Latin America
Minimum	0.67%	6.0%
Maximum	66.7%	37.6%
Range	66.0%	31.6%
Mean	21.5%	17.8%
Median	19.7%	18.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	15.0%	16.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	23.5%	20.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.6%	4.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	13.6%	5.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.4%	5.1%

Demographics Similar to Latvians and Immigrants from Latin America by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from England (19.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Canada (19.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Jamaican (19.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Turkish (19.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from North America (19.5%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants from Oceania (19.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (19.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (19.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Canadian (19.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (19.7%, a difference of 0.24%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Immigrants \| England	92.9 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| Canada	92.9 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 19.5%
Latvians	92.7 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 19.5%
Jamaicans	92.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 19.5%
Turks	92.1 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| North America	92.1 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 19.5%
Soviet Union	92.0 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 19.5%
Russians	91.5 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 19.5%
Austrians	90.7 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| Morocco	89.9 /100 \| #138	Excellent 19.6%
Indians (Asian)	88.3 /100 \| #139	Excellent 19.6%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	85.6 /100 \| #140	Excellent 19.7%
Pennsylvania Germans	85.5 /100 \| #141	Excellent 19.7%
Panamanians	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 19.7%
Slavs	84.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	84.1 /100 \| #144	Excellent 19.7%
Canadians	83.8 /100 \| #145	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	83.6 /100 \| #146	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Austria	83.1 /100 \| #147	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Latin America	81.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Oceania	81.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 19.7%