Korean vs Polish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Korean
Polish
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Koreans
Poles
14.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Polish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 498,598,673 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Koreans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.167 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,182,984 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.576 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 2.9%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Korean | Polish |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 42.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 40.6% | 97.1% |
| Mean | 13.2% | 20.7% |
| Median | 11.9% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 19.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 20.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 20.8% |
Demographics Similar to Koreans and Poles by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Lithuanian (14.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Australia (13.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Croatian (14.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and Estonian (14.1%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Sweden (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Zimbabwean (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Serbia (14.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Koreans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Italians | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Laotians | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Poles | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 98.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |