Jordanian vs Immigrants from Ireland Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,299,913 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.714 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,436,919 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 0.34%.

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Jordanian	Immigrants from Ireland
Minimum	0.093%	1.3%
Maximum	100.0%	30.3%
Range	99.9%	29.0%
Mean	11.3%	9.2%
Median	9.0%	8.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.3%	5.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	11.7%	11.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.4%	5.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	13.8%	5.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.7%	5.4%

Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Immigrants from Ireland by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65

In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Burmese (10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Romanian (10.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (10.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Nepal (10.1%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are White/Caucasian (10.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Korean (10.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Bolivia (10.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Poland (10.1%, a difference of 0.22%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Russians	97.9 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 10.0%
Turks	97.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 10.0%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	97.8 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 10.0%
New Zealanders	97.7 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 10.0%
Immigrants \| South Africa	97.7 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 10.0%
Whites/Caucasians	97.5 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 10.0%
Immigrants \| Ireland	97.5 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 10.0%
Koreans	97.4 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 10.1%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	97.3 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 10.1%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	97.3 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 10.1%
Immigrants \| Poland	97.2 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 10.1%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	97.2 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 10.1%
Immigrants \| Nepal	97.2 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 10.1%
Romanians	97.2 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 10.1%
Burmese	97.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 10.1%
Jordanians	97.1 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 10.1%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	97.0 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 10.1%
Ukrainians	96.9 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 10.1%
Puget Sound Salish	96.9 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 10.1%
Immigrants \| Singapore	96.9 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 10.1%
Immigrants \| Sweden	96.7 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 10.1%