Italian vs Polish Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Italian
Polish
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Italians
Poles
13.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Italian vs Polish Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,533,046 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.551 and weighted average of 13.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,911,563 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.467 and weighted average of 14.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Italian | Polish |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 64.3% |
| Range | 98.7% | 63.8% |
| Mean | 16.5% | 16.3% |
| Median | 10.6% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.8% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.7% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Italians and Poles by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Korean (13.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Estonian (13.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (13.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Asia (13.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Greece (13.9%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Israel (14.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Tsimshian (14.1%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Belgium (14.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Croatians | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Estonians | 99.2 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Italians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Poles | 98.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Tsimshian | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.2% |