Immigrants from Serbia vs Croatian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,662,408 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,548,262 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.309 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 1.5%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Serbia	Croatian
Minimum	2.4%	2.8%
Maximum	49.6%	100.0%
Range	47.1%	97.2%
Mean	13.8%	23.8%
Median	12.3%	13.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.8%	10.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	17.2%	24.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.4%	13.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.4%	24.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.3%	24.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia and Croatians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Zimbabwean (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Greece (14.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Czech (14.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Greek (14.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Israel (14.2%, a difference of 0.15%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.5 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 14.0%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.4 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 14.0%
Koreans	99.4 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.4 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.3 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 14.1%
Croatians	99.3 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	99.3 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 14.2%
Czechs	99.3 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 14.2%
Greeks	99.2 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Israel	99.2 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.1 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 14.2%
Italians	99.1 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 14.3%
Luxembourgers	99.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 14.3%
Estonians	98.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Romania	98.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	98.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Serbia	98.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.8 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 14.4%
Zimbabweans	98.8 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 14.4%
Poles	98.7 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 14.4%
Cambodians	98.7 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 14.4%