Immigrants from India vs Maltese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from India
Maltese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from India
Maltese
6.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from India vs Maltese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 432,464,451 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.457 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,303,911 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 14.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from India | Maltese |
| Minimum | 0.60% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 11.3% | 18.6% |
| Range | 10.7% | 17.5% |
| Mean | 4.5% | 6.5% |
| Median | 4.1% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from India and Maltese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Chinese (6.5%, a difference of 4.3%), Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 6.0%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 6.6%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 10.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Iranian (7.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |