Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Norwegian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Norwegian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Norwegians
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Norwegian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,546,628 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 529,824,258 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 5.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 0.35% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 13.9% | 42.9% |
| Range | 13.5% | 41.1% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 7.2% |
| Median | 6.1% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Norwegians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 1.4%), Bhutanese (7.0%, a difference of 2.3%), Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 2.8%), Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |