Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 442,016,061 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198 and weighted average of 18.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,065,649 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080 and weighted average of 17.9%, a difference of 1.7%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Bhutanese	Immigrants from Nicaragua
Minimum	1.5%	4.2%
Maximum	43.1%	40.3%
Range	41.7%	36.1%
Mean	15.9%	16.5%
Median	14.7%	17.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.6%	11.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	20.1%	20.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.5%	8.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.8%	6.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.7%	6.8%

Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Nicaragua by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Sri Lankan (18.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Asian (18.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Samoan (18.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (18.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (18.2%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Immigrants from Greece (17.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South America (17.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Native Hawaiian (17.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Moldova (17.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Croatia (17.9%, a difference of 0.14%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Immigrants \| Vietnam	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 17.8%
Immigrants \| Moldova	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 17.9%
Native Hawaiians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 17.9%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 17.9%
Immigrants \| Greece	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 17.9%
Immigrants \| South America	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 17.9%
Immigrants \| Croatia	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 17.9%
South Americans	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 18.0%
Puget Sound Salish	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 18.0%
Immigrants \| Romania	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 18.0%
Immigrants \| Argentina	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 18.0%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 18.1%
Macedonians	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 18.1%
Nicaraguans	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 18.1%
Spanish American Indians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 18.1%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 18.2%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 18.2%
Sri Lankans	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 18.2%
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 18.2%
Samoans	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 18.2%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	99.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 18.2%