Bermudan vs Potawatomi Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bermudan
Potawatomi
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Bermudans
Potawatomi
9.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bermudan vs Potawatomi Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,709,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,705,487 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 3.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bermudan | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 1.5% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 22.4% | 50.0% |
Range | 20.8% | 46.6% |
Mean | 8.7% | 15.1% |
Median | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 18.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bermudans and Potawatomi by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Eritrea (9.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cambodia (9.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Japanese (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Africa (9.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and Marshallese (9.9%, a difference of 0.91%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are French American Indian (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Nigeria (10.2%, a difference of 0.67%), Nigerian (10.1%, a difference of 0.92%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.1%, a difference of 0.95%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |