Asian vs Immigrants from China Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Asian
Immigrants from China
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Asians
Immigrants from China
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Immigrants from China Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,990,324 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.626 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,627,723 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Asian | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.28% |
| Maximum | 22.0% | 17.7% |
| Range | 20.8% | 17.4% |
| Mean | 9.7% | 9.7% |
| Median | 9.6% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Asians and Immigrants from China by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Bolivian (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Maltese (11.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Turkish (11.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Bhutanese (11.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Tongan (11.5%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Bolivia (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Indian (Asian) (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Burmese (11.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Asians | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.5% |