Jordanian vs Asian In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Jordanian
Asian
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Jordanians
Asians
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Asian In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,400,430 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 85.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 550,086,140 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Asians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010 and weighted average of 85.1%, a difference of 0.11%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Asian |
| Minimum | 58.3% | 75.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 96.5% |
| Range | 41.7% | 21.0% |
| Mean | 85.6% | 85.0% |
| Median | 86.1% | 85.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 82.0% | 84.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 89.6% | 86.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Asians by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Chile (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Asia (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), South African (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Chinese (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Israel (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Immigrants from Southern Europe (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Egypt (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (85.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kuwait (85.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Denmark (85.1%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 94.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 94.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Asians | 93.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Armenians | 92.2 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Australians | 92.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 91.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Austrians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Slavs | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 90.2 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Chinese | 89.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 89.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 85.0% |
| New Zealanders | 89.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 88.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Jordanians | 88.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 85.0% |
| South Africans | 88.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 85.0% |