Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Egypt In Labor Force | Age 45-54

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,727,636 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.300 and weighted average of 83.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,402,368 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.474 and weighted average of 83.4%, a difference of 0.060%.

In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Indian (Asian)	Immigrants from Egypt
Minimum	73.3%	54.1%
Maximum	89.7%	96.5%
Range	16.4%	42.4%
Mean	83.2%	82.3%
Median	83.8%	84.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	82.1%	82.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	84.6%	89.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.5%	7.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.6%	10.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.6%	10.5%

Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Immigrants from Egypt by In Labor Force | Age 45-54

In terms of in labor force | age 45-54, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (83.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Asia (83.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Japan (83.3%, a difference of 0.0%), South American (83.3%, a difference of 0.0%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (83.3%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Russian (83.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Cuban (83.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (83.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Croatia (83.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and Jordanian (83.4%, a difference of 0.010%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 45-54
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	97.1 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 83.4%
Immigrants \| Somalia	96.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 83.4%
Estonians	96.9 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 83.4%
Russians	96.8 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 83.4%
Cubans	96.7 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 83.4%
Immigrants \| Egypt	96.6 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 83.4%
Belgians	96.5 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 83.4%
Immigrants \| Croatia	96.5 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 83.4%
Jordanians	96.4 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 83.4%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	96.3 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 83.4%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	96.3 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 83.4%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	96.0 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 83.3%
Greeks	95.9 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 83.3%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	95.7 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 83.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	95.6 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 83.3%
Immigrants \| Asia	95.6 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 83.3%
Indians (Asian)	95.5 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 83.3%
Immigrants \| Japan	95.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 83.3%
South Americans	95.5 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 83.3%
Danes	95.3 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 83.3%
Italians	95.1 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 83.3%