Chippewa vs Fijian In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Chippewa
Fijian
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Chippewa
Fijians
82.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
82.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Fijian In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,016,348 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043 and weighted average of 82.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,946,572 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.167 and weighted average of 82.9%, a difference of 0.030%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Fijian |
Minimum | 26.1% | 50.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 91.2% |
Range | 73.9% | 41.2% |
Mean | 79.1% | 79.7% |
Median | 82.3% | 82.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 70.9% | 80.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 87.0% | 84.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.0% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.7% | 10.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Fijians by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Puget Sound Salish (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), African (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (82.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belize (82.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Pennsylvania German (82.9%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Immigrants from Bangladesh (82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Belize (82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Osage (82.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (82.9%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Samoans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 83.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 83.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 83.1% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 83.1% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 83.0% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 82.9% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 82.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 82.9% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 82.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 82.9% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 82.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 82.8% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 82.7% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 82.7% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 82.6% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 82.6% |