Pakistani vs Ute Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Pakistani
Ute
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Pakistanis
Ute
27.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
96.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Ute Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,080,458 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.237 and weighted average of 27.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,657,508 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.154 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 0.80%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pakistani | Ute |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 6.3% |
| Maximum | 66.6% | 73.7% |
| Range | 64.9% | 67.4% |
| Mean | 27.1% | 32.2% |
| Median | 27.7% | 28.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.8% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.7% | 39.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 13.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis and Ute by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.13%), South American Indian (28.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Arab (28.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Chilean (28.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Kenya (28.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from the Azores (28.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Indonesian (28.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Oceania (28.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 98.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Indonesians | 98.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 98.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Palestinians | 98.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Sioux | 98.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Choctaw | 98.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 98.0 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 97.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 97.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 97.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Spaniards | 97.4 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Scandinavians | 97.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 97.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Arabs | 97.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| South American Indians | 96.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 96.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Pakistanis | 96.0 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 27.9% |