Malaysian vs Immigrants from Cuba Single Father Households
COMPARE
Malaysian
Immigrants from Cuba
Single Father Households
Single Father Households Comparison
Malaysians
Immigrants from Cuba
2.7%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Cuba Single Father Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,437,553 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,764,180 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 2.5%.
Single Father Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Malaysian | Immigrants from Cuba |
| Minimum | 0.53% | 0.43% |
| Maximum | 9.3% | 7.5% |
| Range | 8.8% | 7.0% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 2.9% |
| Median | 3.1% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Immigrants from Cuba by Single Father Households
In terms of single father households, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Immigrants from Fiji (2.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Choctaw (2.7%, a difference of 0.59%), Chickasaw (2.8%, a difference of 0.80%), Japanese (2.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and Honduran (2.8%, a difference of 0.91%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Ottawa (2.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Hawaiian (2.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (2.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Central American Indian (2.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (2.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Households |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 0.1 /100 | #280 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.1 /100 | #281 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Malaysians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 2.8% |