Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Choctaw Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,321,946 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201 and weighted average of 28.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,568,825 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584 and weighted average of 28.1%, a difference of 0.34%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Nicaragua	Choctaw
Minimum	4.6%	6.5%
Maximum	49.0%	89.9%
Range	44.4%	83.4%
Mean	27.9%	29.2%
Median	28.4%	27.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	25.1%	24.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.1%	29.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.1%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.3%	12.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.2%	12.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua and Choctaw by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Ute (28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Chilean (28.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Panamanian (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Kenya (28.1%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Sioux (28.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South America (28.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (28.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Uganda (28.0%, a difference of 0.17%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Thailand	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Liberia	99.4 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 28.2%
Chickasaw	99.4 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 28.2%
Panamanians	99.3 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Colombia	99.2 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	99.1 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 28.2%
Ute	99.1 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 28.2%
Chileans	98.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Kenya	98.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Azores	98.8 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 28.1%
Indonesians	98.8 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	98.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 28.1%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.7 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 28.1%
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%