Burmese vs Immigrants from China Single Mother Households
COMPARE
Burmese
Immigrants from China
Single Mother Households
Single Mother Households Comparison
Burmese
Immigrants from China
5.3%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Immigrants from China Single Mother Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,476,720 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.337 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,104,054 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%.
Single Mother Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 9.3% | 8.5% |
| Range | 8.2% | 7.3% |
| Mean | 4.2% | 4.2% |
| Median | 4.3% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Immigrants from China by Single Mother Households
In terms of single mother households, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Latvian (5.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (5.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Bhutanese (5.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants from Japan (5.2%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Cypriot (5.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from India (5.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Israel (5.0%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Australia (5.1%, a difference of 0.63%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.72%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Households |
| Immigrants | Israel | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Soviet Union | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Thais | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Armenians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.7 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.3% |