Cherokee vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan 10th Grade
COMPARE
Cherokee
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
10th Grade
10th Grade Comparison
Cherokee
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
94.1%
10TH GRADE
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
94.1%
10TH GRADE
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan 10th Grade Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,720,058 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with at least 10th grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 94.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,444,172 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and percentage of population with at least 10th grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351 and weighted average of 94.1%, a difference of 0.0%.
10th Grade Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Immigrants from Kazakhstan |
| Minimum | 79.2% | 84.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 20.8% | 15.9% |
| Mean | 94.8% | 95.6% |
| Median | 94.8% | 96.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 93.2% | 94.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 96.8% | 98.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Immigrants from Kazakhstan by 10th Grade
In terms of 10th grade, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Nonimmigrants (94.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Hmong (94.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (94.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Chickasaw (94.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Jordan (94.1%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Nonimmigrants (94.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Hmong (94.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (94.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Chickasaw (94.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Jordan (94.1%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 10th Grade |
| Creek | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 94.2% |
| Osage | 91.7 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 94.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 91.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 94.2% |
| Shoshone | 90.8 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 94.2% |
| Arapaho | 90.5 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 94.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 89.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 94.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 89.4 /100 | #139 | Excellent 94.2% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Hmong | 86.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Albanians | 86.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Cherokee | 84.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 83.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Chickasaw | 82.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 81.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 94.0% |
| Arabs | 80.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 94.0% |
| Ugandans | 80.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 94.0% |
| Egyptians | 79.6 /100 | #150 | Good 94.0% |
| Kenyans | 79.1 /100 | #151 | Good 94.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 78.0 /100 | #152 | Good 94.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 94.0% |