Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Indonesia Disability Age 35 to 64

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,509,630 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.432 and weighted average of 9.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,721,507 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 4.4%.

Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Soviet Union	Immigrants from Indonesia
Minimum	0.79%	0.38%
Maximum	14.6%	32.9%
Range	13.8%	32.6%
Mean	8.0%	10.2%
Median	7.8%	8.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.8%	6.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	10.1%	11.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.3%	4.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.0%	6.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.9%	6.4%

Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Immigrants from Indonesia by Disability Age 35 to 64

In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Venezuela (9.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Burmese (9.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Argentina (9.3%, a difference of 0.75%), Okinawan (9.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and Cypriot (9.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Turkish (9.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Australia (9.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Bulgarian (9.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and Immigrants from Japan (9.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 35 to 64
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 8.9%
Immigrants \| Korea	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 9.0%
Burmese	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 9.2%
Soviet Union	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 9.2%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 9.3%
Immigrants \| Argentina	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 9.3%
Okinawans	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 9.4%
Cypriots	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 9.4%
Argentineans	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 9.4%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 9.4%
Venezuelans	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 9.4%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Asia	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Japan	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.9 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 9.6%
Turks	99.9 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 9.7%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.9 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 9.7%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.9 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 9.7%
Bulgarians	99.9 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 9.7%