Palestinian vs Immigrants from Central America Disability Age 18 to 34

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,373,033 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 18 and 35 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 533,089,991 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 18 and 35 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%.

Disability Age 18 to 34 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Palestinian	Immigrants from Central America
Minimum	1.7%	0.28%
Maximum	15.4%	29.6%
Range	13.7%	29.3%
Mean	6.5%	6.3%
Median	6.3%	6.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.5%	5.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	7.9%	6.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.4%	1.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.8%	2.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.8%	2.8%

Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Immigrants from Central America by Disability Age 18 to 34

In terms of disability age 18 to 34, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Sweden (6.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Europe (6.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Honduras (6.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Spanish American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Belize (6.4%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Immigrants from Eritrea (6.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Bulgarian (6.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Tongan (6.4%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (6.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and Honduran (6.4%, a difference of 0.71%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 18 to 34
Immigrants \| Europe	88.8 /100 \| #134	Excellent 6.4%
Palestinians	88.5 /100 \| #135	Excellent 6.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	88.5 /100 \| #136	Excellent 6.4%
Immigrants \| Honduras	87.7 /100 \| #137	Excellent 6.4%
Spanish American Indians	87.7 /100 \| #138	Excellent 6.4%
Immigrants \| Belize	87.4 /100 \| #139	Excellent 6.4%
Immigrants \| Fiji	87.3 /100 \| #140	Excellent 6.4%
Jamaicans	86.8 /100 \| #141	Excellent 6.4%
South American Indians	86.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 6.4%
Immigrants \| Latvia	86.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 6.4%
Albanians	85.3 /100 \| #144	Excellent 6.4%
Moroccans	85.2 /100 \| #145	Excellent 6.4%
Belizeans	84.9 /100 \| #146	Excellent 6.4%
Immigrants \| South Africa	83.7 /100 \| #147	Excellent 6.4%
Immigrants \| Belgium	83.5 /100 \| #148	Excellent 6.4%
Hondurans	83.1 /100 \| #149	Excellent 6.4%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	82.7 /100 \| #150	Excellent 6.4%
Tongans	81.9 /100 \| #151	Excellent 6.4%
Bulgarians	78.3 /100 \| #152	Good 6.5%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	77.4 /100 \| #153	Good 6.5%
Immigrants \| Central America	76.8 /100 \| #154	Good 6.5%