Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Scandinavian Cognitive Disability

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,576,863 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.453 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,549,780 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 0.52%.

Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Eastern Asia	Scandinavian
Minimum	8.6%	4.2%
Maximum	22.1%	47.1%
Range	13.5%	42.9%
Mean	16.1%	17.8%
Median	16.4%	15.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	15.6%	13.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	17.1%	20.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.5%	6.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.2%	8.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.2%	8.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Scandinavians by Cognitive Disability

In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are British (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Carpatho Rusyn (17.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Aleut (17.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and French (17.0%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are European (17.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (17.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Uruguay (17.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (17.0%, a difference of 0.21%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Cognitive Disability
Scandinavians	94.1 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 16.9%
Europeans	93.4 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 17.0%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	93.1 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 17.0%
Nicaraguans	93.0 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 17.0%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	92.9 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 17.0%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	92.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 17.0%
Immigrants \| Germany	92.1 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 17.0%
Whites/Caucasians	92.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 17.0%
Immigrants \| Jordan	91.9 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 17.0%
Immigrants \| Chile	91.7 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 17.0%
Lebanese	91.3 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 17.0%
Israelis	91.0 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 17.0%
Immigrants \| Norway	90.9 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 17.0%
Welsh	90.8 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 17.0%
French	90.0 /100 \| #139	Excellent 17.0%
Chileans	89.9 /100 \| #140	Excellent 17.0%
Aleuts	89.9 /100 \| #141	Excellent 17.0%
Carpatho Rusyns	89.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 17.0%
British	89.3 /100 \| #143	Excellent 17.0%
Immigrants \| Brazil	89.3 /100 \| #144	Excellent 17.0%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	88.7 /100 \| #145	Excellent 17.0%