Immigrants from Romania vs Uruguayan Disability Age Over 75

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,823,298 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.085 and weighted average of 46.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,749,021 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 46.2%, a difference of 0.51%.

Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Romania	Uruguayan
Minimum	7.5%	23.7%
Maximum	86.7%	88.0%
Range	79.2%	64.4%
Mean	43.0%	45.7%
Median	44.4%	44.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	39.5%	29.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	48.1%	47.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.6%	17.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.0%	18.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.9%	18.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania and Uruguayans by Disability Age Over 75

In terms of disability age over 75, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Immigrants from South Central Asia (46.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Jordanian (46.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (46.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Hungary (46.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and Cambodian (46.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Danish (46.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (46.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Romanian (46.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Jordan (46.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Latvia (46.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age Over 75
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.4 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 46.0%
Immigrants \| Romania	99.3 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 46.0%
Jordanians	99.2 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 46.1%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.2 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 46.1%
Immigrants \| Hungary	99.1 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 46.1%
Cambodians	99.1 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 46.1%
Egyptians	99.0 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 46.1%
Serbians	99.0 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 46.1%
Slavs	98.9 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 46.1%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	98.9 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 46.2%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	98.8 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 46.2%
Swiss	98.8 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 46.2%
Soviet Union	98.8 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 46.2%
New Zealanders	98.8 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 46.2%
Immigrants \| Latvia	98.7 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 46.2%
Argentineans	98.7 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 46.2%
Immigrants \| Jordan	98.7 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 46.2%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	98.6 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 46.2%
Romanians	98.6 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 46.2%
Danes	98.6 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 46.2%
Uruguayans	98.4 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 46.2%