Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Brazilian Disability Age 65 to 74

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,181,573 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.318 and weighted average of 22.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,321,623 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292 and weighted average of 22.4%, a difference of 1.0%.

Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Costa Rica	Brazilian
Minimum	5.6%	2.4%
Maximum	36.1%	45.9%
Range	30.5%	43.6%
Mean	19.5%	22.1%
Median	20.2%	21.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	14.3%	18.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	23.7%	24.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.4%	5.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.7%	7.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.6%	7.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica and Brazilians by Disability Age 65 to 74

In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Uruguay (22.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Albania (22.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Nepal (22.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Costa Rican (22.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Slovak (22.5%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Swedish (22.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Austrian (22.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (22.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Laotian (22.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Ukrainian (22.3%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 65 to 74
Immigrants \| South America	95.5 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 22.3%
Syrians	95.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 22.3%
Ukrainians	95.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 22.3%
Laotians	94.9 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 22.3%
Brazilians	94.8 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 22.4%
Swedes	94.7 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 22.4%
Austrians	94.7 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	94.7 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	93.9 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 22.4%
Czechs	93.5 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Jordan	93.5 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 22.4%
Hungarians	93.3 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 22.4%
Norwegians	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 22.5%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	92.3 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 22.5%
Lebanese	92.2 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 22.5%
Slovaks	91.6 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 22.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	90.4 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 22.6%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	90.1 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 22.6%
Immigrants \| Albania	90.0 /100 \| #130	Excellent 22.6%
Immigrants \| Nepal	89.4 /100 \| #131	Excellent 22.6%
Costa Ricans	89.2 /100 \| #132	Excellent 22.6%