Cuban vs Jordanian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Cuban
Jordanian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Cubans
Jordanians
10.0%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Jordanian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,900,102 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.311 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,388,357 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 1.2%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cuban | Jordanian |
Minimum | 2.0% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 28.5% | 19.9% |
Range | 26.6% | 16.3% |
Mean | 8.9% | 10.0% |
Median | 9.0% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Jordanians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Immigrants from Poland (10.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Romania (10.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (10.1%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Vietnam (10.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Mongolian (10.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Chile (10.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Latvia (10.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Croatia (10.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Cubans | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 99.5 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.5 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 99.5 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | France | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Laotians | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Mongolians | 99.4 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Latvians | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.2% |