Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Venezuelan Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,259,052 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,350,237 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Venezuelans and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%.

Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Sri Lanka	Venezuelan
Minimum	1.9%	0.30%
Maximum	20.0%	12.1%
Range	18.1%	11.8%
Mean	7.3%	6.3%
Median	6.3%	6.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.9%	5.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	8.4%	7.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.5%	2.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.7%	2.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.7%	2.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Venezuelans by Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Kenyan (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from China (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Bhutanese (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Taiwan (6.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and Luxembourger (6.2%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Venezuelans are Immigrants from Lithuania (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Latvian (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Australia (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), German Russian (6.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Mongolian (6.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
Mongolians	99.2 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 6.2%
Venezuelans	99.1 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 6.2%
Latvians	99.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 6.2%
German Russians	99.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 6.2%
Soviet Union	98.9 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 6.2%
Burmese	98.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Turkey	98.9 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 6.2%
Turks	98.8 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 6.2%
Swedes	98.8 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	98.7 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	98.7 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	98.6 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	98.4 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 6.2%
Luxembourgers	98.3 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	98.3 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 6.2%
Bhutanese	98.2 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| China	98.1 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 6.2%
Kenyans	98.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	97.9 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 6.3%