Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Welsh Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,148,963 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 422,905,586 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.71%.

Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Central Asia	Welsh
Minimum	1.8%	4.8%
Maximum	16.6%	70.5%
Range	14.8%	65.7%
Mean	5.9%	18.1%
Median	5.2%	11.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.5%	5.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.5%	20.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.0%	15.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.7%	18.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.7%	18.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia and Welsh by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Sri Lankan (5.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Germany (5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Asian (5.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Bolivia (5.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Turkey (5.3%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Senegalese (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Burmese (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cambodia (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Thailand (5.2%, a difference of 0.13%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Serbians	97.0 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Thailand	97.0 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 5.2%
Senegalese	96.5 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 5.2%
Welsh	96.5 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 5.2%
Burmese	96.4 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 5.2%
Japanese	96.4 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Cambodia	96.3 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	95.9 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	95.6 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 5.2%
Yugoslavians	95.5 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 5.2%
Iranians	95.2 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 5.2%
Malaysians	95.1 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 5.2%
Austrians	94.5 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	94.1 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Singapore	93.9 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	93.6 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 5.2%
Sri Lankans	92.7 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 5.3%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	92.4 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 5.3%
Immigrants \| Germany	91.6 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 5.3%
Asians	91.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 5.3%
Immigrants \| Turkey	90.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 5.3%