Immigrants from Malaysia vs Indian (Asian) Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,796,374 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.394 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,677,018 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.25%.

Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Malaysia	Indian (Asian)
Minimum	0.70%	1.3%
Maximum	27.8%	12.3%
Range	27.1%	11.0%
Mean	8.3%	6.4%
Median	6.2%	6.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.8%	5.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	8.9%	7.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.1%	2.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.4%	2.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.4%	2.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia and Indians (Asian) by Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Immigrants from Hong Kong (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from France (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Scandinavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Palestinian (6.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (6.3%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Northern Africa (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lebanon (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (6.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Kenyan (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	98.4 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 6.2%
Luxembourgers	98.3 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	98.3 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 6.2%
Bhutanese	98.2 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| China	98.1 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 6.2%
Kenyans	98.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	97.9 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	97.8 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 6.3%
Indians (Asian)	97.8 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	97.8 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 6.3%
Palestinians	97.7 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	97.5 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	97.5 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| France	97.4 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 6.3%
Scandinavians	97.4 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 6.3%
Belgians	97.0 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 6.3%
Carpatho Rusyns	96.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Jordan	96.8 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Korea	96.7 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 6.3%
Icelanders	96.6 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 6.3%
Asians	96.4 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 6.3%