Immigrants from Indonesia vs Cypriot Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,987,749 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 6.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,986,412 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.086 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 2.3%.

Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Indonesia	Cypriot
Minimum	1.5%	1.6%
Maximum	32.5%	23.3%
Range	31.0%	21.7%
Mean	8.5%	7.0%
Median	6.7%	5.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.2%	5.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	7.9%	7.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.7%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.5%	4.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.3%	4.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Indonesia and Cypriots by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

In terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Immigrants from Cuba (6.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Asian (6.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Russia (6.7%, a difference of 0.37%), Bhutanese (6.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Hmong (6.7%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Soviet Union (6.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Laotian (6.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Japan (6.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Israel (6.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Bulgarian (6.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 6.5%
Laotians	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 6.5%
Soviet Union	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 6.5%
Cypriots	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 6.5%
Immigrants \| Japan	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 6.5%
Immigrants \| Israel	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 6.5%
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| Belarus	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| Moldova	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 6.6%
Tsimshian	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 6.6%
Yakama	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 6.6%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 6.6%
Sri Lankans	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 6.6%
Hmong	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Russia	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 6.7%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.9 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Cuba	99.9 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 6.7%
Bhutanese	99.9 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 6.7%