Immigrants from Cuba vs Cherokee Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Cherokee
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Cherokee
4.6%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
25.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Cherokee Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 295,099,136 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221 and weighted average of 4.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 403,321,685 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 17.0%.
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Cherokee |
Minimum | 0.30% | 0.30% |
Maximum | 13.4% | 75.0% |
Range | 13.1% | 74.7% |
Mean | 5.0% | 9.5% |
Median | 4.7% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 8.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 13.5% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Sudanese (4.6%, a difference of 0.51%), Tsimshian (4.6%, a difference of 0.88%), Indonesian (4.7%, a difference of 1.4%), Comanche (4.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and Chickasaw (4.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Basque (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Maltese (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Denmark (5.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from China (5.4%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Lithuanians | 32.4 /100 | #186 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 30.6 /100 | #187 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 28.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 28.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.4% |
Basques | 26.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 26.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.4% |
Maltese | 26.4 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.4% |
Cherokee | 25.8 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 24.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | China | 24.2 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
Costa Ricans | 21.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
Colville | 20.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
Albanians | 17.8 /100 | #198 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 16.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 15.2 /100 | #200 | Poor 5.4% |