Immigrants from China vs Iranian Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 429,685,796 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.200 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,911,685 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iranians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%.

Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from China	Iranian
Minimum	1.3%	0.80%
Maximum	11.7%	20.5%
Range	10.4%	19.7%
Mean	6.3%	7.3%
Median	6.1%	6.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.3%	5.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	7.3%	8.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.0%	3.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	1.9%	3.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	1.9%	3.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Iranians by Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Kenyan (6.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Bhutanese (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Lebanon (6.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Indian (Asian) (6.3%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Romania (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Switzerland (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Asian (6.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Icelander (6.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Korea (6.3%, a difference of 0.40%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
Bhutanese	98.2 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| China	98.1 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 6.2%
Kenyans	98.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	97.9 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	97.8 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 6.3%
Indians (Asian)	97.8 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	97.8 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 6.3%
Palestinians	97.7 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	97.5 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	97.5 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| France	97.4 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 6.3%
Scandinavians	97.4 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 6.3%
Belgians	97.0 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 6.3%
Carpatho Rusyns	96.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Jordan	96.8 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Korea	96.7 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 6.3%
Icelanders	96.6 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 6.3%
Asians	96.4 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	96.0 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Romania	95.9 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 6.3%
Iranians	95.8 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 6.3%