Immigrants from Barbados vs Luxembourger Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,625,004 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074 and weighted average of 7.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,757,324 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502 and weighted average of 7.7%, a difference of 1.7%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Barbados	Luxembourger
Minimum	1.0%	3.8%
Maximum	42.4%	100.0%
Range	41.4%	96.2%
Mean	11.3%	19.7%
Median	8.7%	16.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.7%	7.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	12.9%	23.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.2%	16.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.3%	22.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.2%	21.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Barbados and Luxembourgers by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Barbados are Immigrants from Israel (7.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Iran (7.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Sweden (7.6%, a difference of 0.26%), South African (7.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (7.5%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Norway (7.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Hungary (7.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Kiowa (7.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Ugandan (7.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and Colville (7.7%, a difference of 0.28%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Chickasaw	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 7.3%
Cypriots	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 7.4%
Israelis	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 7.4%
Immigrants \| Cuba	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 7.4%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 7.5%
South Africans	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 7.5%
Immigrants \| Barbados	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Israel	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Iran	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 7.6%
Guyanese	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 7.6%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Norway	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 7.7%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 7.7%
Kiowa	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 7.7%
Ugandans	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 7.7%
Colville	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 7.7%