Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Osage Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,435,926 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.140 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,596,996 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.010 and weighted average of 9.4%, a difference of 1.5%.

Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Afghanistan	Osage
Minimum	2.1%	2.6%
Maximum	21.4%	53.6%
Range	19.3%	51.0%
Mean	9.7%	11.9%
Median	9.4%	9.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.5%	7.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	11.4%	11.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.9%	4.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.3%	10.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.3%	9.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan and Osage by Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Scandinavian (9.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (9.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Cambodian (9.5%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Hmong (9.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Chinese (9.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Tongan (9.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Nepal (9.4%, a difference of 0.28%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
Slovenes	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 9.3%
Immigrants \| Sudan	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 9.3%
Danes	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 9.3%
Czechs	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 9.3%
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 9.4%
Hmong	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 9.4%
Osage	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 9.4%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 9.4%
Tongans	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 9.4%
Immigrants \| Nepal	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 9.4%
Taiwanese	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 9.4%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 9.5%
Swedes	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 9.5%
Scandinavians	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 9.5%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 9.5%
Australians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 9.6%
Yugoslavians	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 9.6%