Chinese vs Hmong Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years
COMPARE
Chinese
Hmong
Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years
Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years Comparison
Chinese
Hmong
16.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 16 TO 19 YEARS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 16 TO 19 YEARS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Hmong Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,869,699 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 16.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,611,613 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and unemployment rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Hmong |
Minimum | 0.70% | 5.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 25.8% |
Range | 99.3% | 20.4% |
Mean | 20.0% | 15.5% |
Median | 16.8% | 15.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 19.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.0% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.3% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.1% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Hmong by Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Kenyan (16.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Jordanian (16.0%, a difference of 0.050%), English (16.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Sudan (16.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and European (16.1%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Immigrants from Nepal (16.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Croatian (16.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Fijian (16.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Lebanon (16.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Bulgarian (16.3%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 16.0% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 16.0% |
Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 16.0% |
Kenyans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 16.1% |
English | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Hmong | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Fijians | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 16.3% |