Immigrants from Romania vs Laotian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,629,326 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.539 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,726,350 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 1.3%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Romania	Laotian
Minimum	3.6%	2.3%
Maximum	100.0%	35.0%
Range	96.4%	32.7%
Mean	16.7%	14.7%
Median	12.8%	14.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.1%	9.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	16.8%	19.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.6%	9.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	17.5%	7.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	17.3%	7.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania and Laotians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Zimbabwean (14.4%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Argentina (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Poland (14.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Belgium (14.5%, a difference of 0.41%), European (14.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and Slovene (14.6%, a difference of 0.46%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.1 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 14.2%
Italians	99.1 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 14.3%
Luxembourgers	99.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 14.3%
Estonians	98.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Romania	98.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	98.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Serbia	98.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.8 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 14.4%
Zimbabweans	98.8 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 14.4%
Poles	98.7 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 14.4%
Cambodians	98.7 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 14.4%
Scandinavians	98.7 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Europe	98.7 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Philippines	98.6 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.6 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 14.5%
Immigrants \| Belgium	98.5 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 14.5%
Laotians	98.4 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 14.5%
Immigrants \| Argentina	98.3 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Poland	98.2 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 14.6%
Europeans	98.1 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 14.6%
Slovenes	98.1 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 14.6%