Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Taiwan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from Taiwan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from Taiwan
11.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Taiwan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,845,930 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.289 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,090,597 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 6.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from Taiwan |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 18.6% | 21.4% |
| Range | 17.3% | 19.9% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 8.6% |
| Median | 9.5% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Taiwan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (11.3%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.58%), Bulgarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.99%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Thai (10.5%, a difference of 0.76%), Chinese (10.4%, a difference of 1.4%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 3.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.0%, a difference of 4.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |