Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cree Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,312,053 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,900,369 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cree and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.577 and weighted average of 19.0%, a difference of 1.3%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar	Cree
Minimum	5.8%	4.1%
Maximum	55.6%	100.0%
Range	49.8%	95.9%
Mean	22.3%	26.7%
Median	19.5%	20.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	15.4%	17.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	28.0%	33.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	12.6%	15.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.2%	17.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.1%	17.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cree by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are French American Indian (19.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Africa (19.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Liberian (19.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and Ecuadorian (19.3%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cree are Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from the Azores (18.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (19.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (19.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Salvadoran (19.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Immigrants \| Eritrea	0.8 /100 \| #237	Tragic 18.6%
Immigrants \| Laos	0.8 /100 \| #238	Tragic 18.7%
Cape Verdeans	0.7 /100 \| #239	Tragic 18.7%
Immigrants \| Cuba	0.6 /100 \| #240	Tragic 18.8%
Immigrants \| Sudan	0.6 /100 \| #241	Tragic 18.8%
Ghanaians	0.5 /100 \| #242	Tragic 18.9%
Immigrants \| Azores	0.4 /100 \| #243	Tragic 18.9%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	0.4 /100 \| #244	Tragic 18.9%
Cree	0.4 /100 \| #245	Tragic 19.0%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	0.4 /100 \| #246	Tragic 19.0%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.3 /100 \| #247	Tragic 19.0%
Salvadorans	0.3 /100 \| #248	Tragic 19.0%
Alsatians	0.3 /100 \| #249	Tragic 19.1%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.2 /100 \| #250	Tragic 19.2%
French American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #251	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.2 /100 \| #252	Tragic 19.3%
Liberians	0.2 /100 \| #253	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #254	Tragic 19.3%
Ecuadorians	0.2 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Liberia	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%