Czechoslovakian vs Bhutanese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Bhutanese
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Bhutanese
10.9%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Bhutanese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 364,126,572 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,170,245 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.400 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 3.1%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.75% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 57.4% | 29.4% |
| Range | 56.6% | 27.7% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 9.8% |
| Median | 14.5% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.9% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Bhutanese by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Thai (10.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Finnish (10.8%, a difference of 0.62%), Latvian (10.8%, a difference of 0.76%), Scotch-Irish (10.8%, a difference of 0.93%), and Luxembourger (10.8%, a difference of 0.98%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Lithuanian (10.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Polish (10.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Menominee (10.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Slovene (10.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Czech (10.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
| Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Poles | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Irish | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Swiss | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Marshallese | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| British | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Latvians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Finns | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.4 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Thais | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |